Which of the following best describes when a Firearm Control Card (FCC) can be revoked by the IDFPR without a hearing?

The reason that the fourth option is accurate is that the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR) has the authority to revoke a Firearm Control Card (FCC) when a holder engages in conduct that presents an imminent threat or danger to the public. This provision is crucial as it allows for immediate action to protect public safety without the delays that can come with a hearing process. The rationale is that if an individual's actions put the public at risk, swift intervention is necessary to mitigate that danger.

The other options involve different conditions under which the IDFPR may take action, but they are not about imminent threats. For example, failing to notify the IDFPR of an arrest may lead to disciplinary action, but it doesn't necessarily pose an immediate risk. Similarly, while repeated complaints about a cardholder's behavior can raise concerns, they do not warrant revocation without a hearing. Failing to submit to a psychological evaluation could also lead to issues, but again, it does not create an immediate danger like committing an act that threatens public safety. Thus, the focus on immediate danger in this scenario accurately captures the intent and responsiveness of the IDFPR's regulatory framework.