A person is justified in the use of force intended to cause death or great bodily harm if the person reasonably believes the force is necessary to prevent all of the following, except:

A person is justified in the use of force intended to cause death or great bodily harm if the person reasonably believes the force is necessary to prevent all of the following, except:

• A. Imminent death to another.
• B. Great bodily harm to himself.
• C. The commission of a forcible felony.
• D. The commission of a felony.

Answer: (B)

The correct choice is that a person is not justified in using force intended to cause death or great bodily harm to prevent great bodily harm to themselves. In the legal context, self-defense and defense of others are crucial concepts; they allow individuals to use reasonable force, including deadly force, when faced with an imminent threat to life or serious injury. This justification typically extends to protecting others from imminent death, preventing the commission of a forcible felony, and responding to situations where a serious threat is present. However, when it comes to solely protecting oneself from great bodily harm, the law usually emphasizes the need for a proportional response. The justification for using deadly force is aligned with responding to threats of death or serious harm from external sources, rather than reacting to a situation where the harm is specific to the individual without an imminent threat from another party. Therefore, the focus on self-defense does not typically extend to preemptively using deadly force against potential bodily harm when the threat does not involve another person's aggressive action, which is why this choice is the exception.

The correct choice is that a person is not justified in using force intended to cause death or great bodily harm to prevent great bodily harm to themselves. In the legal context, self-defense and defense of others are crucial concepts; they allow individuals to use reasonable force, including deadly force, when faced with an imminent threat to life or serious injury. This justification typically extends to protecting others from imminent death, preventing the commission of a forcible felony, and responding to situations where a serious threat is present.

However, when it comes to solely protecting oneself from great bodily harm, the law usually emphasizes the need for a proportional response. The justification for using deadly force is aligned with responding to threats of death or serious harm from external sources, rather than reacting to a situation where the harm is specific to the individual without an imminent threat from another party. Therefore, the focus on self-defense does not typically extend to preemptively using deadly force against potential bodily harm when the threat does not involve another person's aggressive action, which is why this choice is the exception.